I hate to be the one to say it, but both sides of this argument are completely unsourced. The person who made this post clearly has a bias, so of course they’d cherry pick good things Arin has said and offer none of the reasoning Jon has given for his actions.
Arin only wins if you already agreed with him. That’s not to say Jon is perfect, what he’s said and done is up for debate, morally speaking, but Jon was not given a platform to defend himself in this post, and Arin hasn’t done anything in this post but respond to unseen assailants. Of course he looks better.
at times arin is a misinformed borderline internet sjw.
As exercise, I’ll be sharing a drop of my inspiration folder each day for a month. The theme will remain unspoken and will be relaxed yet connected. Let me know what you think and if you’d like to suggest a topic :)